Page 781 des 8 617 résultats trouvés :
Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 10789/84 K ., F. and P . v/the UNITED KINGDO M K ., F. et P . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of I I October 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du I I octobre 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requète Article 26 of fhe Convention : Counsel's doubts as to the prospects of success of an appeal to the House of Lords do not absolve applicants from the strict requirements of the Article . even where leave to appeal has been refused by the Coun of Appeal. 7his is especially so where the...
Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQU6TE N° I0475183 Graham DYER v/the UNITED KINGDO M Graham DYER c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 9 October 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 9 octobre 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 5, paragraph I of the Convention : 7he "right tosecurirv" is a guarantee against arbitrariness of arrest and detention . Art icle 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention : The concept of "civil rights and obligations" is amonomous. 7he right to compensation for damage caused bv negligence is, as...
| S. c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE
Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQU@TE N° 10686/ 93 S . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y S . c/RÃPUBLIQUE FÃDÃRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 5 October 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 5 octobre 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article I of the Convention : Contracting States cannot incur responsbility under the Convention for the acts of a third State within that third State's jurisdiction . Competence ratione materiae : 77ze Convention does not guarantee a right to diplomatic protenion in the context...
Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQU@TE N° 10092/82 loaquim BARAONA v/PORTUGA L Joaquim BARAONA c/PORTUGAL DECISION of 5 October 1984 on the admissibility of the decision DÃCISION du 5 ocnobre 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requbt e Arflcle 6, paragraph I of the Conven tion : Is the provision applicable to an action against the State jbr essentially material damage suffered following events taking place during a difficult time of revolutionary charaaer ? Length of civil praceedings still at first instance three years after rheir...
Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICA77ON/REQUÃ7'6 N° 10147/82 M . v/FRANCE M . c/FRANC E DECISION of 4 October 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 4 octobre 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requ@t e Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention : 77z e mere use of closed-circuit television in the course of criminal proceedings to show those present in court documents from the case file does not, of itself, constitute a breach of the provision . Article 6, paragraphe 7, de la Convention : Ne constitue pas, en soi, une violation de...
Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUÃTE N° 9465/8 1 M . v/AUSTRI A M . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 4 October 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 4 octobre 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Article I of the FYrst Protocol : A public law right to the shared use of common land Austrian "Allmende " is not a"possession" for the purposes of this Anicle . Article 1 du Pro tocole additionnef : Un droit, dérivant du droit public, de paniciper à !'usage de terrains communautaires en Autriche : â¢Amende . n'est pas...
Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUÃTE N° 9686/82 S . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY S . c/RÃPUBLIQUE FÃDÃRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 4 October 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 4 octobre 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requdt e Article 4, paragraph 3 c et d of the Convention : A requirement that ihe holder of shooting rights participate in the gassing of fox-holes as pan of a campaign against an epidemic is justified by one of these provisions. Artlcle 4, paragraphe 3, lift c et d, de la Convention...
Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUÃTE N° 1 0031/8 2 A . v/SWEDE N A . c/SUED E DECISION of 3 October 1984 Striking off the list of cases DÃCISION du 3 octobre 1984 Radiation du rôle Rule 44, paragraph I of the Commission's Rules of Prrocedure : Failure by applicant's representatives to submit written letter of authority,- loss of contact by lawyers with applicant the absence.In of any general interest, application struck off the list of cases . Article 44, paragraphe 1, du Règlement intérieur de la Comnrission : Requéte...
Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUÃTE N° 10142/82 U . v/LUXEMBOUR G U . c/LUXEMBOUR G DECISION of 8 July 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 8 juillet 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requête Arlicle 3 of the Convention : To fall within the scope of rhis provision ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity reference to Ireland v. United Kingdom judgment of 18.1 .78 . Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention : The fact that the Anotney-General has a longer period for entering appeals than ihe defendant...
| BATELAAN et HUIGES c. PAYS-BAS
Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUÃTE N° 10438/8 3 H .J . BATELAAN and J . HUIGES v/the NETHERLANDS H .J . BATELAAN et J . HUIGES c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 3 October 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 3 octobre 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 1, paragraph 1 of the First Protocol : G'cence for medical doctors to dispense medicines . 7he withdrawaJ of such aicence, where the conditions for its grant no longer subsist, does not amount to an interferencewith properry . Future income constitutes a...