La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 775

Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICA77ON/REQUÉ7'6 N° 10147/82 M . v/FRANCE M . c/FRANC E DECISION of 4 October 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 4 octobre 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requ@t e Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention : 77z e mere use of closed-circuit television in the course of criminal proceedings to show those present in court documents from the case file does not, of itself, constitute a breach of the provision . Article 6, paragraphe 7, de la Convention : Ne constitue pas, en soi, une violation de...

Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 9465/8 1 M . v/AUSTRI A M . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 4 October 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 4 octobre 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Article I of the FYrst Protocol : A public law right to the shared use of common land Austrian "Allmende " is not a"possession" for the purposes of this Anicle . Article 1 du Pro tocole additionnef : Un droit, dérivant du droit public, de paniciper à!'usage de terrains communautaires en Autriche : •Amende . n'est pas...

Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 9686/82 S . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY S . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 4 October 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 4 octobre 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requdt e Article 4, paragraph 3 c et d of the Convention : A requirement that ihe holder of shooting rights participate in the gassing of fox-holes as pan of a campaign against an epidemic is justified by one of these provisions. Artlcle 4, paragraphe 3, lift c et d, de la Convention...

Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 1 0031/8 2 A . v/SWEDE N A . c/SUED E DECISION of 3 October 1984 Striking off the list of cases DÉCISION du 3 octobre 1984 Radiation du rôle Rule 44, paragraph I of the Commission's Rules of Prrocedure : Failure by applicant's representatives to submit written letter of authority,- loss of contact by lawyers with applicant the absence.In of any general interest, application struck off the list of cases . Article 44, paragraphe 1, du Règlement intérieur de la Comnrission : Requéte...

Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10142/82 U . v/LUXEMBOUR G U . c/LUXEMBOUR G DECISION of 8 July 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 8 juillet 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requête Arlicle 3 of the Convention : To fall within the scope of rhis provision ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity reference to Ireland v. United Kingdom judgment of 18.1 .78 . Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention : The fact that the Anotney-General has a longer period for entering appeals than ihe defendant...

Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10438/8 3 H .J . BATELAAN and J . HUIGES v/the NETHERLANDS H .J . BATELAAN et J . HUIGES c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 3 October 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 3 octobre 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 1, paragraph 1 of the First Protocol : G'cence for medical doctors to dispense medicines . 7he withdrawaJ of such aicence, where the conditions for its grant no longer subsist, does not amount to an interferencewith properry . Future income constitutes a...

Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQU*TE N° 10980/8 4 G . v/LIECHTENSTEI N G . c/LIECHTENSTEI N DECISION of 3 october 1984 on the adntissibility of the application DÉCISION du 3 octobre 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requèt e Article 7, paragraph I of the Convention : Conviction for a criminal ofjence under a provision which, although not very clear taken alone, when read in conjunction with another provision of the same statute, is sufficiently precise for individuals to be able to regulate their conduct : not contrary to the Anicle...

Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUfiTE N° 10515/8 3 M . v/SWEDE N M . c/SUEDE DECISION of 2 October 1984 on the admissibili ty of the application DÉCISION du 2 octobre 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention : A refusa of leave to appeal in a civil case by the Swedish Supreme Court does not constitute a "determination of . . . civil rights and obligations". Competence ratione materiae of the Commi.ssion : 77ze Convention does not guarantee ihe right to appeal. AtYiele 6, parngrnphe / , de la...

Art. 5-3 AUSSITOT TRADUITE DEVANT UN JUGE OU AUTRE MAGISTRAT ... COUR CHAMBRE AFFAIRE SKOOGSTRÖM c. SUÈDE Requête no 8582/79 ARRÊT STRASBOURG 2 octobre 1984 En l’affaire Skoogström, La Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme, constituée, conformément à l’article 43 art. 43 de la Convention de sauvegarde des Droits de l’Homme et des Libertés fondamentales "la Convention" et aux clauses pertinentes de son règlement*, en une chambre composée des juges dont le nom suit: MM.  G. Wiarda, président, R. Ryssdal, W. Ganshof van der Meersch, G. Lagergren, E. García de Enterría Sir  Vincent...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 8-1 RESPECT DE LA CORRESPONDANCE, Art. 8-1 RESPECT DE LA VIE PRIVEE, Art. 8-2 DEFENSE DE... APPLICA77ON/REQOt;TE N° 10414183 R . S . and Z . v/SWITZERLAN D R . S . et Z . c/SUISS E DECISION of I October 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 1°• octobre 1964 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 10, paragraph I of the Convention : A disciplinary measure imposed on a lawyer fo!lowing public statements on a case where he is acting is an interference with his right to freedom of expression . Arricle 10, paragraph 2 of the Convention : a /n making public...