Page 823 des 8 617 résultats trouvés :
Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATIQN/REQUtTE N° 7308/7 5 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 12 October 1978 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÃCISION du 12 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article B, paragraph 2 and Article 10, paragraph 2 of the Convention : An interference is "in accordance with the law" even if it is based on delegated legislation which has been enacted on the basis of a statute stricto sensu . The seizure of magazines depicting adults engaged in...
Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7669/76 X . Company v/the NETHERLANDS Société X . c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 12 October 1978 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÃCISIQN du 12 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e A rticle 1, paragraph 2 of the First Protocol : Contribution required from companies in a pa rticular branch of industry by virtue of a collective agreement to which compulsory effect had been given by ministerial decree . Article 1- , paragraphe 2, du Protocole...
Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUÃTE N° 7909/74 X . and Y v/AUSTRI A X . et Y . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 12 October 1978 on the admissibility of the applicatio n . DÃCISION du 12 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 6, paragraph 3 Ibl of the Convention a This provision can only be invoked by the accused, and not by his counsel personafly . b . Opening of the trial fixed at an early date . Examination in the light of the circumstances of .the concrete case, of the preparatory time of...
Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUÃTE N° 7610/7 6 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 9 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 9 mai 1977 sur la recevabllité de la requèt e A rticle 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : Justification of judicial decisions authorising the almost complete rupture of contacts between young children and their father, called upon to serv e a long sentence and whose marriage has been annulled. Article 8, paragraphe 2, de la Convention...
Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7864/7 7 X . v/BELGIU M X c/BELGIQU E DECISION of 9 October 1978 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÃCISION du 9 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 2 of the First Protocol : Therecognition, by a diploma, of studies completed abroad may be subject to an examination, in conformity with the ru/es in force in each State . Article 2 du Protocole additionnel : La reconnaissance, par un diplôme, des études accomplies à l'étranger peut étre...
Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUÃTE N°8295/78 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M -X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 9 October 1978 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÃCISION du 9 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6 paragraph 3 c of the Convention : The right to choose freely one's defence counsel is not an absolute one . The fact that a particufar .fawyer, is not allowed, given his personal interest in a case, to repmsent an accused person does not violate this provfsion...
| DE NAPOLES PACHECO c. BELGIQUE
Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7775/7 7 Mario DE NAPOLES PACHECO v/BELGIUM Mario DE NAPOLES PACHECO c/BELGIOU E DECISION of 5 October 1978 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 5 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 1, paragraph I of the First Protocof a A claim may constitute "possessions ". b. There can be no quesrion of deprivation of possessions if a condirional claim lapses as a result of the non-fulfilment of the condition . Competence ratione temporis : The...
Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7986/77 Petra KRAUSE v/SWITZERLAND ' Petra KRAUSE c/SUISSE ' DECISION of 3 October 1978 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 3 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 3 ol the Convention : Examinations of the conditions of detention o/a person p/aced in solidarity confinement . Article 6, paragraph 2 of the Convention : The presumption of innocence is not limited to procedural guaranrees ; it requires that no representative of the...
| X. et Y. c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE
Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATIQN/REQUÃTE N° 8059/7 7 X . and Y . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . et Y . c/REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 3 October 1978 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISIQN du 3 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Article 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : As a general rule, it is preferable that a child be raised at home rather . than in a public institution. Only very serious reasons justify that a child be removed-from his family and placed in...
Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8166/78 X . and Y . v/SWITZERLAND ⢠X . et Y . c/SUISSE ⢠DECISION of 3 October 1978 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 3 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : It must be accepted that the maintenance of good order and security in prison would be prejudiced if married prisoners were to meet their spouses in prison without supervision in order to maintain their conjugal life . This argument is...