La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 778

Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 5-3 JUGE OU AUTRE MAGISTRAT EXERCANT DES FONCTIONS JUDICIAIRES, Art. 5-4 INTRODUIRE UN RECOURS, Art. 5-4... APPLICATION/REQUF:TE N° 10272/8 3 M . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY M . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 18 May 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 18 mai 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 5, paragraph 1a and e of the Convention : Preventive detention ordered by a judge for an indefinite period at the same time as a prison sentence, but to follow it, comes under Article 5, paragraph a . Such detention, ordered for psychiarric...

Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 5-3 JUGE OU AUTRE MAGISTRAT EXERCANT DES FONCTIONS JUDICIAIRES, Art. 5-4 INTRODUIRE UN RECOURS, Art. 5-4... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10416/8 3 K . v/IRELAN D K . c/IRLAND E DECISION of 17 May 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 17 mai 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requèt e Article 26 of the Convention : 77ze Contracting States cannot of their own notion put aside the rule of compliance with the six-months time limit . Examination of the factual circumstances which the applicant claims should be regarded as suspending the running of this time limit . Arlicle 26 de la Convention...

Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 5-3 JUGE OU AUTRE MAGISTRAT EXERCANT DES FONCTIONS JUDICIAIRES, Art. 5-4 INTRODUIRE UN RECOURS, Art. 5-4... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10760/8 4 C . v/the NETHERLANDS C . c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 17 May 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 17 mai 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Artide 3 of the Convenflon :/n derermining whether a deportation order may constitute a violation of this provision the Commission must consider whether the juridical system of the deporting State permits of a careful appraisal of the risk3 to which the individual is esposed, but musr also make its own...

Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 5-3 JUGE OU AUTRE MAGISTRAT EXERCANT DES FONCTIONS JUDICIAIRES, Art. 5-4 INTRODUIRE UN RECOURS, Art. 5-4... APPLICATION/REQU6TE N° 10799/84 Radio X ., S ., v/SWITZERLAN D W . A . J c/SUISS E DECISION of 17 May 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 17 mai 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 10, paragrapph 1, of the Convention : 7he righrto broadcast includes freedom from imerference with the reception of radio broadcasts. Given that this provision authorises the State to require the licensing of broadcasting enterprises, it is legitimate for a State to enact measures...

Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 5-3 JUGE OU AUTRE MAGISTRAT EXERCANT DES FONCTIONS JUDICIAIRES, Art. 5-4 INTRODUIRE UN RECOURS, Art. 5-4... APPLICAI7ON/REQUtTE N° 8950/80 H . vBELGIU M H . cBELGIQUE DECISION of 16 May 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 16 mai 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Artlde 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention : Does the procedure by which a barrister, previously struck off the Roll of practitioners, is refused reinstatement to the Bar Roll, concem civil rights and obligations ? In the affirmative, is the Bar Council which has jurisdiction in the present case, a "tribunal...

Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 5-3 JUGE OU AUTRE MAGISTRAT EXERCANT DES FONCTIONS JUDICIAIRES, Art. 5-4 INTRODUIRE UN RECOURS, Art. 5-4... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 9990/8 2 Lorenzo BOZANO v/FRANC E Lorenzo BOZANO c/FRANC E DECISION of 15 May 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 15 mai 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 5, ptuagcaph If of the Convention : Detention with a view to e.rpulsion found unlawful by national authorities Complaint declared admissible . Article 5, paragraph 4 of the Convention : 7he Article ceases to apply when the detention ends . ArYicle 5, paragraph 5 of the Convention...

Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 5-3 JUGE OU AUTRE MAGISTRAT EXERCANT DES FONCTIONS JUDICIAIRES, Art. 5-4 INTRODUIRE UN RECOURS, Art. 5-4... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE No 10094/82 G . v/AUSTRI A G . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 14 May 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 14 mai 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 14 of the Convention : This article only prohibits discrimination in the enjoyment of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention. A rticle 1, paragraph I of the First Protocol : A claim of entitlement to a survivor's pension for civil servant does not constitute a possession attracting the...

Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 5-3 JUGE OU AUTRE MAGISTRAT EXERCANT DES FONCTIONS JUDICIAIRES, Art. 5-4 INTRODUIRE UN RECOURS, Art. 5-4... APPLICATION/REQIIÉTE N° 10400/83 Z . v/the NETHERLANDS Z . c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 14 May 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 14 mai 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 3 of the Convention : The repeated expulsion of an individual of unascertainable identiry to a state which is not prepared to accept him can raise issues under this provision . The position is different where ihe individual refuses to cooperate with the authorities in establishing his identitv...

Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 5-3 JUGE OU AUTRE MAGISTRAT EXERCANT DES FONCTIONS JUDICIAIRES, Art. 5-4 INTRODUIRE UN RECOURS, Art. 5-4... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE No 10496/8 3 R . v/the UNITED KINGDO M R . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 14 May 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 14 mai 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 8 of the Convention : Local authority given custody of children removed from their parents . As to respect for family life, questions of : a whether the authority's decisions ro place the children with foster parents and to limit the parents' access to them are justifiable ; b to what...

Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 5-3 JUGE OU AUTRE MAGISTRAT EXERCANT DES FONCTIONS JUDICIAIRES, Art. 5-4 INTRODUIRE UN RECOURS, Art. 5-4... APPLICATION/ REQUÉTE N° 105 1 8/83 Josina SCHUURS v/the NETHERLAND S Josina SCHUURS c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 14 May 1984 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 14 mai 1984 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 5, psragrsph I e of the Convention : Decision of a court to detain someone for mental illness who has not been heard. Decision based on declaration by non-specialist doctor . Deprivation of liberty in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law ? Admission by the...