La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 777

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 11045/84 Bbrre Arnold KNUDSEN v/NORWA Y B6rre Arnold KNUDSEN c/NORVEG E DECISION of 8 March 1985 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISION du 8 mars 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requ@t e A rt icles 2 and 25 of the Convention : A ntinister of religion within a State church, dismissed for refusing to perform certain of his functions in protest at a new law concerning the termination of pregnancy . cannot claim to be a victim of a violation of Article 2 of the Convention . Article 9...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 11129/8 4 Ronald BROWN v/the UNITED KINGDO M Ronald BROWN c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 7 March 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 7 mars 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention : Application of the principle of "equality of anns" to leave to appeal procedure . Refusal to lift an injunction over a bank account of the applicant to enable him to pay for representation on an application for leave to appeal : examination of whether...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 9833/82 H . v/the UNITED KINGDOM and IRELAN D H . c/ROYAUME-UNI et IRLAND E DECISION of 7 March 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 7 mars 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 25 of the Convention : 7he mother ofa murdered person regarded as victim of an alleged violation of Article 2 of the Convention . Arficle 26 of the Convention : a In the absence of domestic remedies the six months' period runs from the act complained of in the application. b Alleged...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10243/8 3 TIMES NEWSPAPERS LTD . . Frank Thomas v/the UNITED KINGDOM Robertson GILES . Phillip KNIGHTLEY and Elaine POTTER c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 6 March 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 6 mars 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requèt e Article 10 of the Convention : Complaims tltat the la ie of comernpt of court precems the prepararion of newspaper article on a case which is sub judice : failure to esrnblish rhat the proposed publication would not be...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10371/83 Toivo RUTH v/SWEDE N Toivo RUTH c/SUED E DECISION of 6 March 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 6 mars 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 5, paragraph 5 of the Convention : In order to establish whether this provision has been violated it is necessaryfirst to eramine whether there has been a violation of Article 5 paras . I to 4 of the Convention . Article 16 of the Convention : A refusal by the Swedish Chancellor of Justice, based on the Act on...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 9659/82 James and Sarah BOYLE v/the UNITED KINGDO M James et Sarah BOYLE c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 6 March 1985 on the admissibility of the application • DÉCISION du 6 ntars 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requéte • Arlicle 8 or the Convention : 77ie screening of prisoners' correspondence is not contrary to the provision . 77ze Artice does not oblige States to pay the postage on all correspondence of prisoners . Hoa•erer . problerns could arise if a prisoner's correspondence...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10671/83 T . v/SWEDE N T . c/SUEDE DECISION of 4 March 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 4 mars 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requête Arficle I othe First Prolocol : Even assuming that the provision guarantees to contributars to a social insurance sistem the right to derive benefit from the system, it cannot be ituerpreted as giving a right to a pension of a panicular amount. 7hc right ro a pension based on employvnem nmy, in certain circuntstances, be assimilated...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 11013/84 D . v/the NETHERLAND S D . c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 4 March 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 4 mars 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e A rt icle 5, paragraph 3 oI the Convention : Conscientious objector detained for insubordination . 7he Military Court NL before which he appeared the day afier his arrest was an "ofJicer authorised by law to exercise jtulicial power". Article 5, paragraphe 3, de la Convention : Objecteur de conscience délenu pour...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... It here notes tharthe request cf the applicant's husband for a firearm had been refused and observes in this respect that, according to the applicant's submissions, this refu ;al was apparently based on the fear of the TA'VR that a fitearm woulcl male h~ier husband more of a target . The Commission concltules that the applicant's complaint against the United Ii:ingdom concerning the mur•der of her husband by terrorists in Northern Ireland is naanifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 2 7 para . 2 of the...

APPLICATION/REQUÊTE N° 1 0248/8 3 A . v/SWITZERLAN D A . c/SUISS E DECISION of 5 March 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 5 mars 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 10 of the Convention : li'here a collective aerial, offering wide reception, can be used, a prohibition on erecting a private, outdoor radio aerial does not constitute an interference with the freedom to receive information . Article 10 de la Con vention : Ne ronstitue pas une entrace à la liberré de recevoir des infornmtions l'interdiction d'ériger une antenne extérieure individne!e de radio, alors qu'il est possible de se raccorder...