La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 815

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N°8295/78 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M -X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 9 October 1978 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISION du 9 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6 paragraph 3 c of the Convention : The right to choose freely one's defence counsel is not an absolute one . The fact that a particufar .fawyer, is not allowed, given his personal interest in a case, to repmsent an accused person does not violate this provfsion...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7775/7 7 Mario DE NAPOLES PACHECO v/BELGIUM Mario DE NAPOLES PACHECO c/BELGIOU E DECISION of 5 October 1978 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 5 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 1, paragraph I of the First Protocof a A claim may constitute "possessions ". b. There can be no quesrion of deprivation of possessions if a condirional claim lapses as a result of the non-fulfilment of the condition . Competence ratione temporis : The...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7986/77 Petra KRAUSE v/SWITZERLAND ' Petra KRAUSE c/SUISSE ' DECISION of 3 October 1978 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 3 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 3 ol the Convention : Examinations of the conditions of detention o/a person p/aced in solidarity confinement . Article 6, paragraph 2 of the Convention : The presumption of innocence is not limited to procedural guaranrees ; it requires that no representative of the...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATIQN/REQUÉTE N° 8059/7 7 X . and Y . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . et Y . c/REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 3 October 1978 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISIQN du 3 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Article 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : As a general rule, it is preferable that a child be raised at home rather . than in a public institution. Only very serious reasons justify that a child be removed-from his family and placed in...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8166/78 X . and Y . v/SWITZERLAND • X . et Y . c/SUISSE • DECISION of 3 October 1978 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 3 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : It must be accepted that the maintenance of good order and security in prison would be prejudiced if married prisoners were to meet their spouses in prison without supervision in order to maintain their conjugal life . This argument is...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... COUR PLÉNIÈRE AFFAIRE KLASS ET AUTRES c. ALLEMAGNE Requête no 5029/71 ARRÊT STRASBOURG 6 septembre 1978 En l’affaire Klass et autres, La Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme, statuant en séance plénière par application de l’article 48 de son règlement et composée des juges dont le nom suit: MM.  G. BALLADORE PALLIERI, président, G. WIARDA, H. MOSLER, M. ZEKIA, J. CREMONA, P. O’DONOGHUE, Thór VILHJÁLMSSON, W. GANSHOF VAN DER MEERSCH, Sir...

Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7830/77 X . v/AUSTRI A X . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 13 July 1978 on the admissibility ot the application DÉCISION du 13 juillet 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention : The proceedings by which the competent authority grants or refuses to grant registration of a patent does not constitute a determination of the civil rights and obligations of the inventor. A rtlcle 6, paragraphe 1 de la Convention: La procédure par laquelle l'administration compétente accorde ou refuse un brevet...

Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL ... APPLICATIONS/requétes N° 5727/72, 5744/72 5857/72 joined/jointes X ., Y . and Z . v/the UNITEDKINGDOM ' X ., Y . et Z . c/ROYAUME-UNI ' DECISION of 12 July 1978 on the admissibility ot the applications DÉCISION du 12 juillet 1978 sur la re ce vabilité des requ@tes Articles 5, 6 and 14 of the Convention : Persons suspected of IRA activitie,s, detained in Northern Ireland in conditions similar to those examined by the European Courr of Human Rights in the case of freland v/the United Kingdom . Reference to the decision of the Court . Article...

Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7154/7 5 Association X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M Association X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 12 July 1978 on the admissibility ofthe application DÉCISION du 12 juillet 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Artic%2, paragraph 1 of the Convention : According to the first sentence of this paragraph, States are obliged to take adequate measures to protect life . Examinarion of the precautions taken to reduce the risks of a programme of voluntary vaccination. Article 8 of the Convention : There is no interference in the right to...

Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7544/76 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/REPUBLIQUE FEDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 12 July 1978 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 12 juillet 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Articfe 1 of the Additional Protocol : Costs of proceedings considered as contributions, within the meaning of paragraph 2 in fine. Obligation imposed by law oncounsel to bear rhe cosrs'of suspension of a trial when he is responsibfe for such suspenson is not contrary to his right to the peaceful enjoyment of his...