La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 772

Art. 5-3 DUREE DE LA DETENTION PROVISOIRE ... COUR CHAMBRE AFFAIRE CAN c. AUTRICHE Requête no 9300/81 ARRÊT STRASBOURG 30 septembre 1985 En l’affaire Can*, La Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme, constituée, conformément à l’article 43 art. 43 de la Convention de sauvegarde des Droits de l’Homme et des Libertés fondamentales "la Convention" et aux clauses pertinentes de son règlement, en une chambre composée des juges dont le nom suit: MM.  G. Wiarda, président, F. Gölcüklü, F. Matscher, J. Pinheiro Farinha, L.-E. Pettiti, B. Walsh, C. Russo, ainsi que de MM. M.-A. Eissen...

Art. 5-3 DUREE DE LA DETENTION PROVISOIRE, Art. 6 PROCEDURE PENALE ... APPLICATION / REQU6TE N° 11338/85 Georg BROZICEK v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY Georg BROZICEK c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 12 July 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 12 juillet 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requète Article 6, paragraph I o f the Convention : 7he provision does not apply to the entering of convictions in criminal records : such a pmcedure determines neither civil rights and obligarions nor a criminal charge. Artic/e 6, paragraphe 1, de la Conven tion : lnapplicable à l'inscription de...

Art. 5-3 DUREE DE LA DETENTION PROVISOIRE, Art. 6 PROCEDURE PENALE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10812/84 D . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y D . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 11 July 1985 on Ihe admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 11 juillet 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requèt e Article 8, paragraph 2 or the Convention : a Withdrawnl of a ntrnher's right to custody of her natural son and his pacentent in gtaardiinship . Circumstances justifi,ing these measures regarded as necessa . nforthepci ld'sheat,mornigsdfeom b Pursuatu to an order withdrawing custody, rentoval br the amhorities of a...

Art. 5-3 DUREE DE LA DETENTION PROVISOIRE, Art. 6 PROCEDURE PENALE ... APPLICATION/REQIJÉTE N° 10971/84 Hendrika Sophia VOS v/the NETHERLANDS Hendrika Sophia VOS c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 10 July 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 10 juillet 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Articfe l of the First Protocol : A claim to a disability pension is nor a possession within the nteaning of this Article where, as in the Netherlands, such a pension is paid under a general system based on social solidairty wirh no member of rhe svstem having an identifiable share in the fund. Article 1 - du Protocole...

Art. 5-3 DUREE DE LA DETENTION PROVISOIRE, Art. 6 PROCEDURE PENALE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 1 1219/8 4 John Ib Nielsen KURUP v/DENMARK John lb Nielsen KURUP c/DANEMAR K DECISION of 10 July 1985 on Ihe admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 10 juillet 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, peragraph 3 of the Convention : In determining whether the rights guaranteed by this provision have been respected, the overall position of the defense must be considered. Article 6, paragraph 3 b and c of the Convention : 7he abilip• for an accused to confer with his representative is a fundamental element in the...

Art. 5-3 DUREE DE LA DETENTION PROVISOIRE, Art. 6 PROCEDURE PENALE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10670/8 3 Manfred SCHMID v/AUSTRI A Manfred SCHMID c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 9 July 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 9 juillet 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requèt e Article 5, paragraph 3 of the Convention : 7he guarantees which can be required for relense are not lintited to the deposit of a sum of monev . Arlic%2, paragraph 3 of Protocol No . 4 : Where a persort's release in arcordance trith Article 5 pari. 3 is subject to guarantees which res trict freedom of movement . this interference can be regarded as...

Art. 5-3 DUREE DE LA DETENTION PROVISOIRE, Art. 6 PROCEDURE PENALE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10208/8 2 Willy PAUWELS v/BELGIUM Willy PAUWELS c/BELGIQU E DECISION of 8 July 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 8 juillet 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 5, paragraph 1c of the Convenfion : Criteria for determining whether a deprivation of liberty has been ordered "in accordance with a procedure prescribed hv Iaw" reference to Winierwerp jtalgment . ArYicle 5, paragraph 3 ol'the Convenfion : Does the Belgian Judge Advocate provide the guarantees of independence required by the concept...

Art. 5-3 DUREE DE LA DETENTION PROVISOIRE, Art. 6 PROCEDURE PENALE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10328/ 8 Marléne BELILOS v/SWITZERLAN D Marlène BELILOS c/SUISS E DECISION of 8 July 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 8 juillet 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention : Fine ordered by administrative authorir without possibility of crmn examination of questions of fact . Scope of the Swiss interpretative declaration . Article 64 of the Convention : Does the Stviss interpretative declaration as to Anicle 6 para . I have the effect of a reservation ?Applicatiotr...

Art. 5-3 DUREE DE LA DETENTION PROVISOIRE, Art. 6 PROCEDURE PENALE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10854/8 4 C . v/the UNITED KINGDO M C . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 8 July 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 8 juillet 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e A rticle 5, paragraph 1a of the Convention : Detention after conviction does not cease ro be lawful because the length of detention in a foreign country pending extradition after escape is not deduned from it . Competence ratione materiae : 7he Convention does not guarantee a right ro have the length of detention pending extradition counted as part of...

Art. 5-3 DUREE DE LA DETENTION PROVISOIRE, Art. 6 PROCEDURE PENALE ... APPLICATION/REQUÊTE No 10059/8 2 M . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY M . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉDRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 5 July 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 5 juillet 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph I or the Convention : a Disciplinary proceedings in which a pharmacist is fined for unethical behaviour do not involve civil rights and obligat ions reference to the Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment. b Eramination of the question whether disciplinary proceedings in which a pharmacist...