La Jurisprudences de CEDH | Cour européenne des droits de l'homme concernant formation:Commission (plénière) - page 31

Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL ... ...Commission plénière...APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 9037/8 0 X . v/SWITZERLAN D X . c/SUISS E DECISION of S May 1981 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 5 mai 1981 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph 2 of the Convention : The rute of presumption of inrtocence is rtot infringed by dte fact that an acquitted person rnust, in the absence of an v court decision in this respect, sustain the awyer's fees and a certain loss of incotne as a result of these proceedings . . Article 6, paragraphe 2, de la...

Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL ... ...Commission plénière...APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 9203/8 0 X . v/DENMAR K X . c/DANEMAR K DECISION of 5 May 1981 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 5 mai 1981 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Artlcle 8, peragraph 2 of the Convention : Deporration of an alien rnanied to a nationa l of the country concerned. Measure justified . in the circuntstances of the present case . in pa rt icular in view of the conviction of the person concerned for having infringed the drug traffic code . Artlcle 8, paragraphe 2, de la...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... ...Commission plénière...APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7878/7 7 Patrick FELL v/the UNITED KINGDO M Patrick FELL c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 19 March 1981 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 19 mars 1981 sur la recevabilité de la requête Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention : Prison rule according to which a prisoner is not allowed to have confidential consultations with a solicitor. with a view to bring proceedings before an internal administration enquiry has taken place as regard the object of the complaint internal ventilation rule . Complaint declared adrnissible...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... ...Commission plénière...APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8118/7 7 Swami OMKARANANDA and the DIVINE LIGHT ZENTRUM v/S W ITZERLAN D Swami OMKARANANDA et le DIVINE LIGHT ZENTRUM c/SUISS E DECISION of 19 March 1981 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 19 mars 1981 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 5, paragraph I c of the Convention :/n order to justify arrest and detention on ren :and it cannot be required that the existence and the nature of the offence of which the person concerned is suspected be established since that is the aim of the investigation, the proper...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... ...Commission plénière...APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 8737/79 Werner ZIMMERMANN and Johann STEINER v/SWITZERLAN D Werner ZIMMERMANN et Johann STEINER c/SUISS E DECISION of 18 March 1981 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 18 mars 1981 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 6, paragraph I of the Comention : Lerigth of appeal proceedings concerning civil riglrts and obligations . In particuler examination of the diligence shown by the applicant as wefl the question whether the court's overload constituted a relevant element complaint declared admissible . Article 6...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... ...Commission plénière...APPLICATION /REQUETE N° 8485/79 X . v/SWITZERLAND X . c/SUISS E DECISION of 17 March 1981 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 17 mars 1981 sur la recevabilité de la requ@t e Arricle 5, paragraph 3 of the Convention : The Zürich District Attorney is an "Officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power" Reference to the judgmerrt of the European Court of Human Rights in the Schiesser case. In the present case, the District Attorney before whom the applicant was brought after his arrest did not exercise prosecuting functions against the...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... ...Commission plénière...APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8919/80 Eric VAN DER MUSSELE v/BELGIU M Eric VAN DER MUSSELE c/BELGIQU E DECISION of 17 March 1981 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 17 ntars 1981 sur la recevabilité de la requ@t e Article 4 . paragraph 2 of the Convention : Does the obligation for a barrister to defertd free of charge an indigent accused engender a'~orced or compulson' lahour" ? Article 4, paragraph 3 d of the Convention : Does the obligation for a harrisrer tu defend Jrer of charge urt indigent accused constitute a°normal civic obltgatiou...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... ...Commission plénière...APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8160/78 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 12 March 1981 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 12 mars 1981 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Artclle 9, paragraph I of the Conventlon : The respect of this provision mav create positive obligations for the State. The wording " either alone or itt community with others" does not leave a choice to the public authorities between two alternative obligations . In view of the requirements of the education systent the authorities do not disregard a teacher's...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... ...Commission plénière...APPLICATION/REQUL`l'E N° 8490/7 9 X . v/AUSTRI A X . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 12 March 1981 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 12 mars 1981 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph 3 a and b of the Convention : Have the rights set forth in these provisions been violated if the judge qualifies the facts as separate offences and increases the penalry accordingly while the indictment only mentions one of thent ?Cornplaint declared admissible . Article 7, paragraph I of the Convention : Is there retroactive application of the...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... ...Commission plénière...APPLICATION/REQUETE N°, 8626/7 9 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . c/la RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 12 March 1981 on the admissibiÎity of the application DÉCISION du 12 mars 1981 sur laiecévabilité de la requêt e AAlcle 5, paragraph 1 of the Convention : Where a person .is detained after conviction para . 1 .a the,jact that the prison regime applied to him is made stricter, because he is subject to an order for his detention on rentand in respect of another offence, does not raise any particular issue under Article 5...