La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 827

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7434/7 6 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 16 May 1977 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DECISION du 16 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 8, paragraph I of the Convention : In withholding the foreign address of the applicant's former wife and his daughter, but at the same time offering to forward them his correspondence, the authorities do not infringe Article 8 . Article 26 of the Convention : Exhaustion of domestic remedies . In the case of non compliance with an order granting access, the interested...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7680/7 6 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/REPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 16 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 16 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requête A rticle 5, paragraph I Icl of the Convention : Examination of the lawfulness and merits of a detention on remand. Article 2, paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Fourth Protocol : Lawful detention with a view to criminal proceedings or in order ro se rve a sentence ls a legitimate restriction on the freedom to leave a country . Right not guaranteed...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATIQN/REQUÈTE N° 7697/7 6 X . v/BELGIU M X . c/BELGIQU E DECISION of 16 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISIQN du 16 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 3 of the Convention : This provtsion can nor be interpreted as requiring particular economic and social measures for re/eased convicts. Article 3 de la Convention : Cette disposition ne peut être interprétée comme imposant des mesures économiques et sociales spécifiques en faveur des condamnés libérés. Résumé des faits pertinents English : see p . 1951 Condamné en...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6870/75 Y . v/the UNITED KINGDO M Y . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 14 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 14 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 3 of the Convention : Living conditions of a mental patient committed to hospital. Complaint declared admissible . Article 8, paragraph 1 of the Convention : Detained mental patient prevented from sending a telegram . Message nevertheless transmitted in sufficient time . Manifestly ill-founded. Article 26 of the Convention : Exhaustion of domestic remedies . Where...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6998/75 X . v/the UNITED KINGDOM X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 14 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 14 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 5, paregraph 1a of the Convention : Is this provision applicable to a person whose detention in a psychiatric clinic has been ordered by a megistrate on the basis of the Mental Health Act 1959 in the context of criminal proceedings instituted against him ? Articte 5, paragraph 1 e of the Convention : If a person of unsound mind, released from a psychiatric clinic...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 6840/74 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 12 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 12 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 3 of the Convention : Living conditions of a mental patient committed to hospital. Complaint declared admissible . Article 6, paragraph 2 of the Convention : Does not apply to proceedings before a Mental Health Review Tribunal, called upon to give advice to the Central Admintstration on the continued detention of a mental patient. Article 26 of the Convention...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATIQN/REQUÉTE N° 7628/7 6 X . v/BELGIU M X . c/BELGIQU E DECISION of 9 May 1977 on the admissibility of ihe application DÉCISION du 9 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 6 paragraph 2 of the Convention : The Commission find9 that the conviction was based on a set of elements which were probative according to the law, but is not competent to pronounce itself on the value of the conclusions of the fact finding judge . Article 6, paragraph 3 a of the Convention : The information must relate to the material facts alleged against the accused and their...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7736/76 X . v/SWITZERLAN D X . c/SUISS E DECISION of 9 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 9 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : Censorship of correspondence between two detainees. Such measure, based on an Ordinance for the execution of a particulpr Act, must be considered as being "in accordance with the law" . Article 8, paragraphe 2, de la Convention : Interception de la correspondance entre deux personnes détenues. Une telle mesure, fondée sur une ordonnance...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7754/7 7 X . v/SWITZERLAN D X . c/SUISS E DECISION of 9 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 9 mai 1977 sur la recevabilitA de la requéte Artic% 5, paragraph I of the Convention : Dtsciplinary measures applied to a prisoner do not constitute, as such, a deprivarion of liberty . The conditions of derention are nor regulated by Article 5, paragraph 1 . Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention : A decision by which a prisoner is punished with 5 days of isolation and withdrawal of prison leave for late arrival does not relate to...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6903/75 Julius DE WEER v/BELGIUM Julius DE WEER c/BELGIQU E DECISION of 10 March 1977 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 10 mars 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention : Shopkeeper, charged with an infringement of price regulations, threatened by the public prosecutor with the immediate closure of his shop if he does not pay a fine by way of compromise . Does this constitue a renunciation of the guarantees of a fair trial obtained through threats of considerable materiaf loss ? Application...