La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 827

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° TP29/7 6 Philip Burnett Franklin AGEE v/the UNITED KINGDOM Philip Burnett Franklin AGEE c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 17 December 1976 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 17 décembre 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 3 of the Convention : a The fact that a Member of the Government gave brief details in Parliament of the considerations which led to the decision to deport a person, cannot be said to have involved degrading treatment . b In normal circumstances, deportation of an alien on grounds of State security cannot...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPUCATION/REQUETE N° 6724/ 73 Lazlo KISS v/the UNITED KINGDOM Lazlo KISS c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 16 December 1976 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 16 décembre 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Conventio n a Criminal cherge . Does this provision apply to disciplinary punishment of a convicted pnsoner, consisting of 8 7 days' loss of remission ? Examinetion according to criteria established by the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Enge/and others . b Access to a court : Prisoner not el%wed to consult a...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7467/76 X . v/BELGIUM X . c/BELGIQU E DECISION of 13 December 1976 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 13 décembre 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Article 25 de la Convention : The author of the application, brother of the victim, is considered as being indirect victim of the alleged violations . Article 25 de fe Convention : L'auteur de fa requête, frêre de la victime, est reconnu victime indirecte des violations alféguées . Résumé des faits pertinents English : see p . 221 Le requérant X . a introduit sa requête...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REOUETE N° 7662/76 X . v/the NETHERLANDS X . c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 13 December 1976 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 13 décembre 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requét e A rticle 3 of the Convention : The obligation for an unemployed person to accept at the risk of losing his right to unemployment benefit a job which may possibly be considered socially disreputable does not constitute degrading treatment. Article 4, paragraph 2 of the Convention : Suspension of unemployment benefit for refusel of the offer of a job does not amount to...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7412/76 Dieter HAASE v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN YDietrHASEc/RPUBLIQFDEA'LMGN E DECISION of 11 December 1976 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 11 décembre 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requ9t e Article 5, paragraph 3 of the Convention : Reasonable time . Applicant accused of espionege kept in detention on remend 3 times for a total length of 28 months . Complaint declared admissible . Articfe 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention : Reasonable time criminal . Proceedings having lasted 6 yeers and two months, from first arrest...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REOUÉTE N° 7566/76 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 11 December 1976 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 11 décembre 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 3 of the First Protocol : In respect of the right to vote, a condition of residence ts not contrary to this provision . Article 14 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 3 of the First Protocot : In respect of the right to vote, exemption from the residence requirements for diplomates residing abroad does not constitute a discrimination vis-é-vis...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7641/7 6 X . and Y . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . et Y . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION ol 11 December 1976 on the adrnlssibilily of the appllcallon DÉCISION du 11 cécembre 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requél e A rticle 4, paragraph 2 of the Convention : As regards the concept of forced or compulsory labour, reference to 1LO Conventions Nos 29 and 105 . The service of a legal aid counsel for which he receives reasonable remuneration can not be considered as constituting forced or compulsory labour. Article 6 of the...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6956/75 X . v/the UNITED KINGDOM X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 10 December 1976 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 10 décembre 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Competence ratione persenae of the Commission : The Government of the United Kingdom cannot be held responsible, under the terms of the Convention, for the acts of a solicitor, even though the latter is an officer of the court subject to disciplinary juridiction of the higher courts . Compétence ratione personae de la Commission : Le Gouvernment du RoyaumeUni ne...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7046/7 6 X . v/AUSTRIA X . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 10 December 1976 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 10 décembre 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 25 of the Convention : The Commission cannot examine in abstracto the compatibility of law with the Convention . The person who is unable to demonstrete that he is personelly affected by the application of the law he criticises, cannot claim to be a victim of a viofation of the Convention. Article 25 de la Convention : La Commission ne peut examiner in ebstrecto la...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7256/7 5 X . v/BELGIUM X . c/BELGIQU E DECISION of 10 December 1976 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 10 décembre 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 5, paragraph I fl of the Convention : Examination of the lawfulness under domestic law of a detention with a view to extradition paragraph I of the Convention : Length of civil proceedings. Applicant's .Article6, failure to speed up proceedings. Article I of the First Protocol : There is no violation of the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions if sums are blocked...