La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 804

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N°, 8626/7 9 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . c/la RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 12 March 1981 on the admissibiÎity of the application DÉCISION du 12 mars 1981 sur laiecévabilité de la requêt e AAlcle 5, paragraph 1 of the Convention : Where a person .is detained after conviction para . 1 .a the,jact that the prison regime applied to him is made stricter, because he is subject to an order for his detention on rentand in respect of another offence, does not raise any particular issue under Article 5. paragraph 1 . Detention after conviction in jtrst...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8531 /7 9 A ., B ., C . and D . v/the UNITED KINGDO M A ., B ., C . et D . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 10 March 1981 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 10 mars 1981 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e A rticle 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention : A legislative amerrdntent affectirrg the applicant's civil rights can rtot be regarded as a determination of those rigltts . Article 13 of the Convention : This provision does not relate to legislation and does not guarantee a rernedy by which legislation could be controlled as to its conformitv with the Corrventiorr...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... APPLiCA77ON/REQUETE N° 8741/79 X . v/ the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 10 March 1981 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 10 mars 1981 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 8 of the Convention : The wish to have his ashes scattered on one's own land is so closely related to private /ife that it falls within the sphere of Article 8 . However, given the personal choices it allows for, every regulation on bttrials does not constitute an irtterference with the exercise of the right to respect for private life. Article 9 of the...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8896/80 X . v/the NETHERLANDS X .c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 10 March 1981 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 10 mars 1981 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 12 of the Convetnion : A familv can be 'founded" bv the adoptiorr of a child irr accordance with provisions of national law governing adoption . Article 14 of the Convention In connectlon with Article 12 of the Conventlon Fixing conditions which are nrore stringent than those for the adoption of a 'iational" child . taking into aceozuu particular problems of integration which the adoption of a foreigrr...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8924/8 0 X . v/SWITZERLAN D X . c/SUISS E DECISION of 10 March 1981 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 10 mars 1981 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 8, paragraph I of the Convention : Existence of a family life berween a grandntother and her grandson living with her . Article 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : Child withdrawn from his grandmother in order to be placed in an education centre . Measure considered rtecessary for the protection of the child's health . Article 8, paragraphe 1, de la Convention : Existence d'une vie fantiliale entre une...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 8988/80 X . v/BELGIU M X . c/BELGIQU E DECISION of 10 March 1981 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 10 mars 1981 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention : Not applicable to urgent proceedings which lead to the adjudication of bankruptcy . Article 7, paragraph I of the Convention : Not applicable to the adjudication of bankruptcy by a non-crintinal jurisdiction . Article 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : Control of a bankrupt's correspondence considered rtecessan' for the protection of the rights of others and in some cases...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... COUR CHAMBRE AFFAIRE AIREY c. IRLANDE ARTICLE 50 Requête no 6289/73 ARRÊT STRASBOURG 6 février 1981 En l’affaire Airey, La cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme, constituée, conformément à l’article 43 art. 43 de la Convention de sauvegarde des Droits de l’Homme et des Libertés fondamentales "la Convention" et aux clauses pertinentes de son règlement, en une chambre composée des juges dont le nom suit: MM.  G. WIARDA, président, THÓR VILHJÁLMSSON, W. GANSHOF VAN DER MEERSCH, D. EVRIGENIS, L. LIESCH, F. GÖLCÜKLÜ, B. WALSH, ainsi que de MM. M.-A...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... APPLICATIONS/REQUETES N° 8603/79, 8722/79, 8723/79 8729/79 Joined/Jointes Camillo CROCIANI 1 Bruno PALMIOTTI v/ITALY Mario TANASSI c/ITALI E Antonio LEFEBVRE D'OVIDI O DECISION of 18 December 1980 on the admissibility of the application s DÊCISION du 18 décembre 1980 sur la recevabilité des requêtes Article 5, paragraph I a, of the Convention : This provision extends to detention resulting from a conviction even though the full reasons for the decision have not yet been published. Arlick 6 of the Convention : /napplicable to the parliatnentary procedure leadir:g to the decision to indict ce...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8765/7 9 The LIBERAL PARTY, Mrs R . Mr P. v ./the UNITED KINGDOM PARTILIBÉRAL, Mme R . M . P . c ./ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 18 December 1980 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 18 décembre 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Artlcle 25 of the Conventlon : a A political party . as a gathering of people with a common interest. can be considered as a non governmental organisation or a group of individuals b Can a political party, as such, be considered as a victim of a violation of Article 3 of the First Protocol ?Question not pursued . Article 3 of...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8660/7 9 Ludwig MINELLI v/SWITLERLAND Ludwig MINELLI c/SUISSE , DECISION of 17 December 1980 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 17 décembre 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention : Has the principle of presumption of innocence been disregarded if a judge, in deciding that a criminal prosecution should be atayed in view of the expiry of the limitation period. orders that the accused must pay part of the costs of the proceedings as well as compensation to the plaintiff, on the grounds of what would have been the outcome...