Résultats par plus récent

Filtrés par : CEDH

La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 765

Page 765 des 8 553 résultats trouvés :

CEDH | NYSSEN c. BELGIQUE

Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10574/83 Koen NYSSEN v/BELGIU M Koen NYSSEN c/BELGIQU E DECISION of 10 October 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 10 octobre 1985 sur la reçevabilité de la requ@te Artkle 6, paragraph I of the Convention : Is a coun manial . a rnajority of whos e members are commissioned officers . independent and impanial when it tries, for desenion irt peace-rime . a conscientious objector to both military service and substituted civilian sen -ice? Complainr declared admissible...

CEDH | 10/10/1985 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | TRE TRAKTÖRER AB c. SUEDE

Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10873/8 4 TRE TRAKTÔRER AB v/SWEDE N TRE TRAKTÔRER AB c/SUÈD E DECISION of 10 October 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 10 octobre 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article Iof the Convention : Dtis provision does not-require Coniracting States to irtcorpornte the Convention in their internal legal order. Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention : Does this provision apply to a dispute cortcerning the withdrawal of a restaurateur's licence to sen•e alcoholic...

CEDH | 10/10/1985 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | GLAZEWSKA c. SUEDE

Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... The Commission observes that the Convention does not oblige the Contracting States to recognise as valid in their own jurisdiction, a professional status which an individual has acquired under a foreign jurisdiction . Accordingly, the Convention does not impose on Sweden an obligation to authorise the applicant as a doctor in Sweden simply on the ground that she has such status in Poland cf. No . 7864/77, Dec. 9 .10 .78, D .R . 16 p . 82, where the Commission rejected a complaint from an applicant of Romanian origin...

CEDH | 10/10/1985 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | HAMMERDAHLS STORMARKNAD AB c. SUEDE

Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... finds that the app.7cant's complaint falls outside the scope of Article 10 of the Convention . It follows that the application is incompatible rarione mcteriae within the meaning of Article 27 para . 2bf tie Convention . Por these reasons, the Commissio n DECLARES THE APPLICATION INADMISS IBLE . TRADOCTi'ON EN FAI' r Les faits de la cause, tels qu'ils ressortent des observations de la requérante, peuvent se résumer comme suit . La requérante est une société à responsabilité limitée dont le z;iège est à Vàxjd...

CEDH | 09/10/1985 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | M. c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE

Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10748/84 M . vhhe FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y M . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 7 October 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 7 octobre 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requ@te Article l, paragraph I of the First Protocol : An authorisation to practice rnedecine wtder a heath in.curance scheme does not constitute a "possession". An authorisation to cmtduct a particuar economic activity, even for an indefinite perind, which may be withdrawn in...

CEDH | 07/10/1985 | Cour (chambre)

CEDH | R.F. et S.F. c. AUTRICHE

Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 TRIBUNAL IMPARTIAL ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10847/8 4 R .F . and S .F . v/AUSTRI A R .F . et S .F . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 7 October 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 7 octobre 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Artiele 6, paragraph 2 of the Convention : 7he presumption of innocence is not limited to procedural gtmramees : it requires lhat no representative of tite State declares that a person is guilte of having committed an offence before that guilt is established bv a coun . Issue by the police of a press...

CEDH | 07/10/1985 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | AFFAIRE CAN c. AUTRICHE

Art. 5-3 DUREE DE LA DETENTION PROVISOIRE ... COUR CHAMBRE AFFAIRE CAN c. AUTRICHE Requête no 9300/81 ARRÊT STRASBOURG 30 septembre 1985 En l’affaire Can*, La Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme, constituée, conformément à l’article 43 art. 43 de la Convention de sauvegarde des Droits de l’Homme et des Libertés fondamentales "la Convention" et aux clauses pertinentes de son règlement, en une chambre composée des juges dont le nom suit: MM.  G. Wiarda, président, F. Gölcüklü, F. Matscher, J. Pinheiro Farinha, L.-E. Pettiti, B. Walsh, C. Russo, ainsi que de MM. M.-A. Eissen...

CEDH | 30/09/1985 | Cour (chambre)

CEDH | BROZICEK c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE

Art. 5-3 DUREE DE LA DETENTION PROVISOIRE, Art. 6 PROCEDURE PENALE ... APPLICATION / REQU6TE N° 11338/85 Georg BROZICEK v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY Georg BROZICEK c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 12 July 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 12 juillet 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requète Article 6, paragraph I o f the Convention : 7he provision does not apply to the entering of convictions in criminal records : such a pmcedure determines neither civil rights and obligarions nor a criminal charge. Artic/e 6, paragraphe 1, de la Conven tion : lnapplicable à l'inscription de...

CEDH | 12/07/1985 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | D. c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE

Art. 5-3 DUREE DE LA DETENTION PROVISOIRE, Art. 6 PROCEDURE PENALE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 10812/84 D . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y D . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 11 July 1985 on Ihe admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 11 juillet 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requèt e Article 8, paragraph 2 or the Convention : a Withdrawnl of a ntrnher's right to custody of her natural son and his pacentent in gtaardiinship . Circumstances justifi,ing these measures regarded as necessa . nforthepci ld'sheat,mornigsdfeom b Pursuatu to an order withdrawing custody, rentoval br the amhorities of a...

CEDH | 11/07/1985 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | VOS c. PAYS-BAS

Art. 5-3 DUREE DE LA DETENTION PROVISOIRE, Art. 6 PROCEDURE PENALE ... APPLICATION/REQIJÉTE N° 10971/84 Hendrika Sophia VOS v/the NETHERLANDS Hendrika Sophia VOS c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 10 July 1985 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 10 juillet 1985 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Articfe l of the First Protocol : A claim to a disability pension is nor a possession within the nteaning of this Article where, as in the Netherlands, such a pension is paid under a general system based on social solidairty wirh no member of rhe svstem having an identifiable share in the fund. Article 1 - du Protocole...

CEDH | 10/07/1985 | Commission (plénière)
 
Association des cours judiciaires suprmes francophones
Organisation internationale de la francophonie
Juricaf est un projet de l'AHJUCAF, l'association des Cours suprêmes judiciaires francophones. Il est soutenu par l'Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie. Juricaf est un projet de l'AHJUCAF, l'association des Cours suprêmes judiciaires francophones. Il est soutenu par l'Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie.
Logo iall 2012 website award