La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 841

Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... COUR PLÉNIÈRE AFFAIRE GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI Requête no 4451/70 ARRÊT STRASBOURG 21 février 1975 En l’affaire Golder, La Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme, statuant en séance plénière par application de l’article 48 de son règlement et composée des juges dont le nom suit: MM.  G. BALLADORE PALLIERI, président, H. MOSLER, A. VERDROSS, E. RODENBOURG, M. ZEKIA, J. CREMONA, Mme  H. PEDERSEN, MM.  T. VILHJÁLMSSON, R. RYSSDAL, A., BOZER W.J...

APPLICATION/REOUETE N° 5442/72 X . v/the UNITED KINGDOM X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 20 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DECISIONdu 20 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 8 of the Convention : Right to respect for correspondence . Detention after conviction . Complaint not pursued of the Convention : Buddhist prisoner not permitted to send out material fo r .Article9 publication in a Buddhist magazine . Failed to prove that this was a necessary pert of his religious practice . Article 10 of the Convention : Buddhist prisoner not permitted to send out material for publication in a Buddhist...

APPLICATION/REOUETE N° 5969/72 X . v/NORWAY X . c/NORVÉG E DECISION of 19 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 19 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Article 5, paragraph 5, of the Convention : Any examination of a complaint under this provision presupposes an analysis of the point whether there has been a breach of the rights set forth in para . 1-4 of the same Article . Artfcfe 5, paragraphe 5, de la Convention : L'examen d'un grief tiré de cette disposition nécessite l'examen préalabfe du point de savoir s'il y a eu violation des droits énoncés aux paragraphes 1 à 4 du même article...

APPLICATION/REOUETE N° 6163/7 3 X . v/AUSTRIA X . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 19 December 1974 qn the admissibility of the application DECISION du 19 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilhé de la requéte Article 14 of the Convention in conjunction with Article I of Protocol No . 1 : Income Tax. a A different assessment of workers' and seN-employed persons' income is not contrary to . the seid provision ; b Similar/y, different provisions for the deduction of compu/sory or voluntary contributions to social insorences from taxable income, are not contrary to the said articles. Article 14 defa Convention, combiné avec fértiofe1^ du Protocole...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6566/74 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/REPUBLIQUE FEDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 19 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 19 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Articfe 6 paragraph 3, of the Convention Are these provisions applicable to pretrial proceedings ? l unresolvedl. Article 6, paragraph 3 bl, of the Convention Accused and defence counsel not ellowed to attend the heering by the investigating judge of witnesses abroad . The defence has still the possibility to examine the court files betore the trial. Articfe 6 paragraph 3 dl, of the Convention...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6573/74 X . v/the NETHERLANDS X . c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 19 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 19 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Article 10 of the Convention : This provision does not guarantee the right to vote as such . Article 3 of Protocol No . 1 : This provision implies the recognition of universal suffrage but does not grant the right unreservedty to every single individual to take part in election . Article 14 of the Convention : This Article prohibits discrimination onty with respect to the enjoyment of the rights end freedoms set forth in the Convention...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6577/74 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 19 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 19 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Articte 8 of the Convention : This provision gives protection against unjustified interference with famdy life by public authorities, but does not oblige the State positiveN to reestablish conditions of family life alreedy damaged by the people concerned. Articte 8 de ta Convention : Ce tte disposition protége contre une ingérence injustifiée de l'autorité publique dens la vie famitiale mais...

APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 6753/74 X . and Y . v/the NETHERLANDS X . et Y . c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 19 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 19 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requPt e Article 8 of the Convention : Whether the relationshi/is between minors are protected by the right to respect for private life unresolved . A minor child's forced return to her parents' residence, constitutes, in the circumstances of the case, an exercise of respect for the lffe of her family and a measure necessa ry for the protection of her health and morals within the meaning of paragraph 2 of this provision : This...

APPLICATION/REQU ETE N° 6776/74 X . v/SWEDEN X . c/SUED E DECISION of 19 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 19 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Article 1 of Protocol No . 1 : Obligation of a State to ensure an individual's right to peaceful enjoyment of his property. Cannot reasonably imply any right to claim financial support by the State in order to make possible the enjoyment of possessions . Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention : Determination of a claim for research fund and salary. Lies within the discretion of the administrative authorities and falls within the field of public...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 5029/71 Gerhard KLASS and others v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY Gerhard KLASS et autres c/REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION OF 18 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 18 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Artic/e25 of the Convention : Persons who may have been the subject of measures and not subsequently informed of these measures taken against them . May claim to be the victims of a violation of the Convention. Artic/e 27, paragraph 2 of the Convention : An application raising complex questions of law, which are also of a general interest, cannot be...