La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 809

Art. 35-1 EPUISEMENT DES VOIES DE RECOURS INTERNES, Art. 35-3 RATIONE TEMPORIS, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8249/7 8 X . v/BELGIU M X . c/BELGIOU E DECISION of 5 May 1980 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 5 mai 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e A rticle 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention : Provision inapplicable to procedure of the cornpetent disciplinary body which issued a warning against a/awyer for a minor misdemeanor. A rticle 6, paragraphe 1, de la Convention : Disposition inapplicable à une procédure au cours de laquelle, pour une infraction de peu de gravité, les...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8518/7 9 X . v/ the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . c/RÉPUBLIOUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISiON ol 14 March 1980 on the admissibility ol the application DÉCISION du 14 mars 1980 sur la recevablité de la requèt e Article 3 of the Convention :Forced adminisvarion of inedicines to a menrally abnormal prisoner in a psychiatric hospital, subject to judicial control. Manifestly ill-founded . Article 8 of the Convention : Menrally abnormal offender provided wirh a guardian in particular to authorise ntedical trearntent . Lawful interference justified, in this case, as necessary for the prevention of disorder and...

APPLICATION/REOUETE N° 8083/7 7 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 13 March 1980 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 13 mars 19 80 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 5, paragraph 1 Icl of the Convention :/ndividual deprived of his liberty for several hours pursuant to a bench warrant for contempt of court . The fact that the Court of Appeal subsequently absolved the applicant does not imply that the original detention was invalid. An'icle 6, peregreph 1 and peregraph 3 b of the Convention : An acquitted defendant may not complain of alleged bias of the Court or of difficulties he...

APPLICATIQN/REQUÈTE N° 8427/78 X . v/the NETHERLAND S X . c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 13 March 1980 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISION du 13 mars 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention : Length of proceedings concerning the determination of a divorced father's right of access to h!s child, with the dismissal of a request to provisionally authorise a meeting during the proceedings . Complaint declared admtssible : Refusal by cou rts to grant to a divorced fathe r .Article8ofhCnv the right of access to his child, as the latter might be subject to stress given the /act that the...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8788/79 X . v/SWITZERLAN D X . c/SUISS E DECISION of 12 March 1980 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 12 mars 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 5, paragraph Ic of the Convention : This provision permits the detention on remand of an extradited accused even after the judicial inrestigation has been concluded, where other charges are postponed pending a further applic•ation for extradition . Article 5, paragraph 3, of the Convention : There is nothing to prevent the taking into account of the threat of further criminal proceedings. even ifthev depend upon a State granting...

COUR CHAMBRE AFFAIRE LUEDICKE, BELKACEM ET KOÇ c. ALLEMAGNE ARTICLE 50 Requête no 6210/73; 6877/75; 7132/75 ARRÊT STRASBOURG 10 mars 1980 En l’affaire Luedicke, Belkacem et Koç, La Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme, constituée, conformément à l’article 43 art. 43 de la Convention de sauvegarde des Droits de l’Homme et des Libertés fondamentales "la Convention" et aux clauses pertinentes de son règlement, en une chambre composée des juges dont le nom suit: MM.  G. WIARDA, président, H. MOSLER, Mme  D. BINDSCHEDLER-ROBERT, M.  W. GANSHOF VAN DER MEERSCH, remplaçant Mme H. PEDERSEN...

Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... COUR PLÉNIÈRE AFFAIRE KÖNIG c. ALLEMAGNE ARTICLE 50 Requête no 6232/73 ARRÊT STRASBOURG 10 mars 1980 En l’affaire König, La Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme, statuant en séance plénière par application de l’article 48 de son règlement et composée des juges dont le nom suit: MM.  G. BALLADORE PALLIERI, président, G. WIARDA, H. MOSLER, M. ZEKIA, J. CREMONA, Thór VILHJÁLMSSON, W. GANSHOF VAN DER MEERSCH, Mme  D. BINDSCHEDLER-ROBERT, MM.  D. EVRIGENIS, P.-H. TEITGEN, G. LAGERGREN, L. LIESCH, F. GÖLCÜKLÜ, F. MATSCHER, J. PINHEIRO FARINHA...

APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 8346/7 8 X . v/AUSTRI A X . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 6 March 1980 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 6 mars 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 26 of the Convention : An app/icant who shows, from decided cases, that seeking domestic remedies is doomed to failure is excused from pursuing such remedies . Article 1, paragraph 2 of the First Protocol : A rule providing that prison authorities should retain a portion of income from prison work to provide a lump sum on release ts not in breach of this provision, even if interest is not paid. Article 26 de la Convention : Est dispens...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8581/7 9 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 6 March 1980 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DECISION du 6 mars 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Arllcle 3 of the Convention : The expulsion or extradition of an individual towards a country where there are serious reasons to believe that he will be subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention, raises a problem under this provision . Does this also apply when the danger does not arise from the public authorities but from autonomous groups against which the authorities allegedly do not protect the individual...

APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 8724/7 9 X v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . c/RÉPUBLIOUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 6 March 1980 on the admissibilitY of the applicatio n DECISION dr, 6 inars 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requèt e Article 1 of the First Protocol : A general obligation on States to maintain the purchn.sing power of surns deposited with banking or linancial institutions by way of a sy.stenratic indexation of savings cannot be derived /rorn this provision. Article 1 du Protocole additionnel : On ne saurait déduire de cette disposition une obligation qénérale des Etats de maintenir constant le pouvoir d'achat r/es...