La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 824

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... Summary of the relevant facts Convicted and sentenced to prison in April 1975 for abduction of a minor, the applicant was m/eased in February 1977, without any resources or employment . I TRANSLATION I THE LAW IExtract l The applicant complains that he was released without resources . He appears to allege for this reason a violation of Article 3 of the Convention which forbids inhumain or degrading treatment . This provision can not, however, be interpreted in the present case as obliging the Contracting Parties to take particular economic and social measures in order to...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 6323/7 3 Salvatore BOCCHIERI v/ITALY Salvatore BOCCHIERI c/ITALI E DECISION of 19 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 19 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Article 6 paragraph I of the Convention : Reasonable time . In order to determine the period to be taken into considerdtion it is inappropriate to make a distinction between the stage of investigation and that of the trial. The period starts with the day on which a person is « charged n, the latter term including the person who is faced with a criminal charge...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7816/7 7 X . and Y . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . et Y . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 19 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 19 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 8, paragraph 1 of the Cônvention : To require a married man to leave a State, even if only for the duration of appeal proceedings, constitutes an interference with the right to respect for family life if his wife and child are unable to follow him . Artic% 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : The expulsion of an alien...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... La Commission admet donc qu'il y a eu atteinte à la vie familiale des requérants . Elle rappelle cependant qu'en vertu de l'article 8, paragraphe 2, il peut y avoir ingérence d'une autorité publique dans l'exercice de ce droit pour autant que cette ingérence est prévue par la loi et qu'elle est, dans une société démocratique, nécessaire à la défense de l'ordre et à la prévention des infractions pénales, à la protection de la santé ou de la morale ou à la protection des droits et libertés d'autrui . Or, l'obligation de quitter la République Fédéral...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉT'E N° 6830/74 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 16 May 1977 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISION du 16 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 26 of the Convention : Where the Federal Republic of Germany is concerned, an applicant, who complains of the inadequacy of compensation for expropriation must have lodged a constitutional appeal under Article 14, para . 3 of the Basic Law. Article 26 de la Convention : S âgissant de la République Fédérale d'Allemagne, le...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7050/75 Pat ARROWSMITH v/the UNITED KINGDOM Pat ARROWSMITH c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 16 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 16 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Articfe 10 of the Convention : Pacifist convicted on the besisof the United Kinqdom Incitement to Diseffection Act 1934 for having distributed to soldiers leaflets inciting them to disobedience . Application declared admissible . Article 26 of the Convention : The rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies does not require that the provisions of the...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REOUÉTE N° 7360/76 Leo ZAND v/AUSTRIA Leo ZAND c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 16 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 16 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, para. I of the Convention : a Where the law confers to a minister the right to establish a Labour Court where the need arises, are these courts "established by law" ? b Is a court independent where the judges are appointed and can be removed by decision of an administrative authority ? c In a dispute concerning civil rights and obligations, do the guarantees ot...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7413/76 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 16 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 16 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention : Application of the principle of "equality of arms" to the procedure for examination of a request for leave to . . . . . . appeal. Article 6, paragraphe 1, de fa Convention : Application du principe de "l'égalité des armes" A/a procédure d'examen d'une demande en autorisation d'interjeter appel leave to appeall of the relevant...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7434/7 6 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 16 May 1977 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DECISION du 16 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 8, paragraph I of the Convention : In withholding the foreign address of the applicant's former wife and his daughter, but at the same time offering to forward them his correspondence, the authorities do not infringe Article 8 . Article 26 of the Convention : Exhaustion of domestic remedies . In the case of non compliance with an order granting access, the interested...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7680/7 6 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/REPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 16 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 16 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requête A rticle 5, paragraph I Icl of the Convention : Examination of the lawfulness and merits of a detention on remand. Article 2, paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Fourth Protocol : Lawful detention with a view to criminal proceedings or in order ro se rve a sentence ls a legitimate restriction on the freedom to leave a country . Right not guaranteed...