Résultats par plus récent

Filtrés par : CEDH

La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 823

Page 823 des 8 524 résultats trouvés :

CEDH | X. c. AUTRICHE

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE No 7624/76 X . v/AUSTRI A X . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 6 July 1977 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 6 juillet 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 14 of the Convention in conjunction with Article I of the First Protocol : Examination of the reasons which may justify differences in treatment between different social-professional groups, in respect of the reduction of old-age pension because ofadditionaf earned income . Pensions based on the principle of insurance and pensions based on the principle of support . A rticle I of...

CEDH | 06/07/1977 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | 48 TZIGANES KALDERAS c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE ET PAYS-BAS

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATIONS/REQUETES N°a 7823/ 77-7824/77 • 48 KALDERAS GIPSIES v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY and the NETHERLAND S 48 TZIGANES KALDERAS c/REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE et PAYS-BA S DECISION of 6 July 1977 on the admissibility of the applications DECISION du 6 juillet 1977 sur la recevabilité des requêtes Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention : Refusal of legal aid, in civil matters, can amount to the denial of a fair trial . Article 8 of the Convention : Refusal to deliver a birth certificate can amount to infringement of the right to respect for family tife...

CEDH | 06/07/1977 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | X. c. AUTRICHE

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATIQN/REQUÉTE N° 7138/7 5 X . v/AUSTRI A X . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 5 July 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 5 juillet 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph 3 b of the Convention : lf circumstances require that the defence has access to the file, it is sufficient for the lawyer to exercise this right . Article 6, paragraph 3 c of the Convention : It ts for the competent authorities to decide wherher the accused defends himself in person or with the assistance of a lawyer, nominated by himself or designated ex...

CEDH | 05/07/1977 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | X. et Y. c. ROYAUME-UNI

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATIQN/REQUETE N° 7527/7 6 X . and Y . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . and Y . c/ROYAUME UN I DECISION of 5 July 1977 on the admissibility of the application DECISIQN du 5 juillet 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Artic% 2 of the First Protocof : Access to existing educational facilities and recognition of performed studies Irelerence to the Be/gian Linguistic Case, Eur . Court of H .R .I . Article 2 does not require that the State organises the educational system in accordance with a certain religious philosophical conviction of the parents reference to the case of...

CEDH | 05/07/1977 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | X. c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... Summary of the relevant facts Convicted and sentenced to prison in April 1975 for abduction of a minor, the applicant was m/eased in February 1977, without any resources or employment . I TRANSLATION I THE LAW IExtract l The applicant complains that he was released without resources . He appears to allege for this reason a violation of Article 3 of the Convention which forbids inhumain or degrading treatment . This provision can not, however, be interpreted in the present case as obliging the Contracting Parties to take particular economic and social measures in order to...

CEDH | 05/07/1977 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | BOCCHIERI v. ITALIE

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 6323/7 3 Salvatore BOCCHIERI v/ITALY Salvatore BOCCHIERI c/ITALI E DECISION of 19 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 19 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Article 6 paragraph I of the Convention : Reasonable time . In order to determine the period to be taken into considerdtion it is inappropriate to make a distinction between the stage of investigation and that of the trial. The period starts with the day on which a person is « charged n, the latter term including the person who is faced with a criminal charge...

CEDH | 19/05/1977 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | X. et Y. c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7816/7 7 X . and Y . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . et Y . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 19 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 19 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 8, paragraph 1 of the Cônvention : To require a married man to leave a State, even if only for the duration of appeal proceedings, constitutes an interference with the right to respect for family life if his wife and child are unable to follow him . Artic% 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : The expulsion of an alien...

CEDH | 19/05/1977 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | X. c. ROYAUME-UNI

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... La Commission admet donc qu'il y a eu atteinte à la vie familiale des requérants . Elle rappelle cependant qu'en vertu de l'article 8, paragraphe 2, il peut y avoir ingérence d'une autorité publique dans l'exercice de ce droit pour autant que cette ingérence est prévue par la loi et qu'elle est, dans une société démocratique, nécessaire à la défense de l'ordre et à la prévention des infractions pénales, à la protection de la santé ou de la morale ou à la protection des droits et libertés d'autrui . Or, l'obligation de quitter la République Fédéral...

CEDH | 18/05/1977 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | X.c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉT'E N° 6830/74 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 16 May 1977 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISION du 16 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 26 of the Convention : Where the Federal Republic of Germany is concerned, an applicant, who complains of the inadequacy of compensation for expropriation must have lodged a constitutional appeal under Article 14, para . 3 of the Basic Law. Article 26 de la Convention : S âgissant de la République Fédérale d'Allemagne, le...

CEDH | 16/05/1977 | Commission (plénière)

CEDH | ARROWSMITH c. ROYAUME-UNI

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7050/75 Pat ARROWSMITH v/the UNITED KINGDOM Pat ARROWSMITH c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 16 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 16 mai 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Articfe 10 of the Convention : Pacifist convicted on the besisof the United Kinqdom Incitement to Diseffection Act 1934 for having distributed to soldiers leaflets inciting them to disobedience . Application declared admissible . Article 26 of the Convention : The rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies does not require that the provisions of the...

CEDH | 16/05/1977 | Commission (plénière)
 
Association des cours judiciaires suprmes francophones
Organisation internationale de la francophonie
Juricaf est un projet de l'AHJUCAF, l'association des Cours suprêmes judiciaires francophones. Il est soutenu par l'Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie. Juricaf est un projet de l'AHJUCAF, l'association des Cours suprêmes judiciaires francophones. Il est soutenu par l'Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie.
Logo iall 2012 website award