La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 818

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 8266/78 X . v/UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 4 December 1978 on the admissibility of the applicatio n . DÉCISION du 4 mai1978 sur la recevabilité de la requête , Article 10, paragraph 1, of the Convention : In allowing States to require the licensing of broadcasting enterprises, this provision permits them to prosecute those engaged in the promoting of unlicensed broadcasting .' Article 10, paragraph 2, of the Convention : The .prohibition of notices advertising illicit broadcasting constitutes an interference...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... APPLICATION/REOUETE N° 8065/7 7 X . v/the UNITED KINGDOM ' X . c/ROYAUME-UNI ' DECISION .of 3 May1978 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 3 mai 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requPt e Article 8 of the Convention : Close surveillance of visits made to a prisoner by his wife and children is an interference in the exercise of their right to respect for their private and family life . Since such measures concern someone condemned of serious offence s linked to his membership of a terrorist organisation, they can be considered as necesiary...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... APPLICATION/REQUeTE N° 7597/7 6 BERTRAND RUSSEL PEACE FOUNDATION Ltd v/the UNITED KINGDO M BERTRAND RUSSEL PEACE FOUNDATION Ltd c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 2 May 1978 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 2 mai 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article I of the Convention : It is not enough that the victim of an alleged violation is subject to the jurisdiction of a Contracting State ; the actual fact our of which the alleged violation arises must, in addition, come wirhin the area of jurisdiction of that Stare, in the exercise of...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... APPLICATIQN/REQUÉTE N° 7770/7 7 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY ' X . c/REPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGNE • DECISION of 2 May 1978 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISIQN du 2 mai 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 8, paregraph 1 of the Convention : Litigation between rwo people regarding custody of a child they had without being married. Family life is not absolutely tied to marriage . Article 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : Granting of custody of a child to one of the parents. Interests of the child predominant...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7782/7 7 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 2 May 1978 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 2 mai 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 2 of the Additional Protoco/ : States are not obliged to subsidise a particular form of education in order to respect the religious and phitosophical convictions of parents : it is sufficient that they respect the said convictions within the existing and developing system of education. Article 14 of the Convention, in conjunction with Article 2 of...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7826/7 7 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 2 May 1978 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 2 mai 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 25 of the Convention : Someone who has received adequate redress at the domestic level for the alleged violations of the Convention cannot claim to be a victim of those said alleged violations . Article 25 de la Convention : Celui qui, au plan national, a obtenu le redressement des violations alléguées de la Convention ne saurait se prétendie...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE ... COUR CHAMBRE AFFAIRE TYRER c. ROYAUME-UNI Requête no 5856/72 ARRÊT STRASBOURG 25 avril 1978 En l’affaire Tyrer, La Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme, constituée, conformément à l’article 43 art. 43 de la Convention de sauvegarde des Droits de l’Homme et des Libertés fondamentales "la Convention" et à l’article 21 du règlement, en une chambre composée des juges dont le nom suit: M.  G. BALLADORE PALLIERI, président, M.  J. CREMONA, Mme  H. PEDERSEN, M.  Thór VILHJÁLMSSON, Sir  Gerald FITZMAURICE...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7438/76 Giovanni VENTURA v/ITALY ' Giovanni VENTURA c/ITALIE ' DECISION of 9 March 1978 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 9 mars 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 5 paragraph 3 of the Convention : Detention on remand for 5 years . Examination by the Commission of its length taking into account that part of it preceded the declaration made by Italy under Article 25 of the Convention Complaint declared admissbfel . Articfe 6, paragraph .1 of the Convention : Length of criminal proceedings which partly preceded the...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7428/7 6 X . c/AUSTRIA ' X . c/AUTRICHE ' DECISION of 7 March 1978 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 7 mars 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Articfe 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention : In a case where the tribunal consists of three judges and eight jurymen, who in the present case returned a unanimous verdict, the mere fact that one of the jurymen has links with the injured party does not of itself permit the conclusion that the court !s not impartial. Articte 26 of the Convention : Where it is questioned whether an assize...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7640/76 Frank GEERK v/SWITZERLAN D Frank GEERK c/SUISS E DECISION of 7 March 1978 on the admissibility of the app!ication DÉCISION du 7 mars 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requèt e Article 6, paragraph 2 of the Convention : Accused person ordered to pay legal costs after acquittal. Article 10 of the Convention : Charging legal costs to a person who has been acquitted after having been criminally charged for having published poems ts an interference with the exercise of the freedom of expression . Is this inrerference, in the case in point...